Building on our established China–US logistics operations and commercial model, we welcome US-based logistics companies, industry organizations and universities to develop business cooperation, exchange experience and explore applied research.
Discuss a defined receiving, handover, fulfilment or returns question, then agree a review scope and practical next steps.
Connect US parcel, forwarding, warehouse and fulfilment capabilities with our Guangzhou supplier receiving and China–US shipping operations.
Possible agreed outputs: A service scope and responsibility map, handover checklist and billing reconciliation plan.
Bring Chinese and US practitioners together to compare logistics operating practices and identify shared coordination needs.
Possible agreed outputs: An exchange agenda, documented operating observations and follow-up actions.
Connect logistics and supply-chain teaching or applied research with practical questions from cross-border operations.
Possible agreed outputs: A research question, data-requirements brief and case discussion or study proposal. Data access and publication arrangements are agreed per project.
A connected service chain, with direct postal parcels and US partner warehouse fulfilment as distinct operating options.
Receive supplier deliveries in Guangzhou, record quantities and carry out agreed consolidation, packing and export preparation.
Operating role: Guangzhou operations team
Connect the agreed international route with US customs-release coordination and handover to the selected postal or partner warehouse service.
Operating role: Agreed carriers & US shipping partner
USPS provides the selected postal service after acceptance. A US partner warehouse supports local stock receiving, order fulfilment and authorised returns handling under the agreed scope.
Operating role: USPS & US partner warehouse
The carrier, importer, facilities, handover points, charges and operating records are confirmed for each project. US warehouse services are provided through partner facilities.
Compare direct shipping from China and US stock fulfilment to clarify receiving, transport, delivery and return responsibilities for a proposed operating model.
Agree the service scope, partner roles, charging basis and records for ongoing business cooperation, including handover, billing reconciliation and exception arrangements.
Review inventory records, parcel data, receiving checks, postal handover and exception handling to identify coordination needs between organizations.
Define research questions and study scope around fulfilment efficiency, packaging, reverse logistics and the quality of cross-border operating records.
Share your organization and the question or opportunity you want to discuss.
Agree responsibilities, available information and the outputs appropriate to the proposal.
Confirm contacts, timing and commercial or research arrangements before proceeding.
Introduce your organization and the logistics question, collaboration objective or research topic you would like to discuss. Use the form below to share an initial brief.
Need help preparing? View the brief
Your enquiry is saved with a reference. For direct email, contact partnerships@uspsconsolidator.com.
Choose your organization type for focused preparation prompts, or use the general PDF brief.
Connect US logistics capabilities with our established Guangzhou receiving and China–US shipping operations.
Possible discussion outputs: A proposed service scope, responsibility map, handover checklist and billing reconciliation approach.
Use the outline as optional working notes, then summarize the relevant points in the enquiry. Scope, access, charges and any publication arrangements are agreed for each project.
Prepare a trial around one handover or reconciliation question. Bring a representative operating file, agreed measurement rules and the evidence needed for the next decision. Scope, charges, facilities and any expansion are confirmed with the participants.
Read the study guideCSV column names and worksheet instructions are in English. The templates contain blank fields only.
Identify your company, industry organization or university, the proposed team and its location.
Describe the logistics topic, the question or objective you want to explore and the output you hope to develop.
Suggest an advisory discussion, business cooperation, industry exchange or research project. Note any data or visits you would like to discuss.
Include preferred dates, a contact person and the best way to reach your team.
Use the PDF to prepare your notes, then summarize them in the web enquiry. Project scope, operational access and commercial or research terms are confirmed for each project.
Review how we discuss proposals, project scope and practical arrangements before submitting your collaboration enquiry.
We welcome US-based logistics companies, industry organizations, universities and research teams interested in China–US logistics. Proposals can build on our established operational experience through business cooperation, industry exchange, case discussions or applied research.
Introduce your organization and proposed participants, then outline your topic, objective, preferred format and timing. This helps us discuss how the proposal connects with our existing operations and define an initial scope together.
Prepare your collaboration enquiryThe availability and use of operational data, site access and publication arrangements are agreed for each project. Identify the information, access and intended outputs your proposal requires so these can be discussed when defining the scope.
Your initial enquiry helps us understand the topic. We agree the advisory or collaboration scope, expected outputs, responsibilities, timing and any fees with the proposed participants before work begins.
Use our contact options for shipment pricing, service selection or support with an existing shipment. Include your shipment details or existing reference so your enquiry can be directed to the appropriate service.
View contact optionsState the question, eligible workload, measures, evidence references, open exceptions and proposed next step. Keep the charging basis with the operating scope. The review informs discussion; further work follows the agreement for the project.
Yes. Retain each organization’s original term and compare its object level, physical meaning and supporting evidence. Agree a mapping for the discussion without treating it as an implemented system integration.
Its result describes the stock and locations actually included. Record the selection method, count time, movements and unresolved differences. A broader inference requires a study design appropriate to the intended population.